Runoff production in blanket peat covered catchments

نویسندگان

  • Joseph Holden
  • Tim P. Burt
چکیده

[1] Blanket peat catchments exhibit flashy regimes, but little is known about the exact nature of runoff production processes within these catchments. Catchment, hillslope, and plot-scale monitoring results are presented from the blanket peats of the northern Pennines, United Kingdom. Catchment efficiency for three study catchments with areas of 11.4 km, 0.83 km, and 0.44 km were 72%, 77%, and 82%, respectively. Mean rainfall peak to discharge peak lag times were 2.7 hours, 2.1 hours, and 3.2 hours, respectively. Runoff from hillslopes in the catchments was gauged using runoff troughs. Mean hillslope lag times ranged from 0.6 to 2.2 hours, and despite large differences in the scale of study, there was little difference in response time. This indicates that slopes and channels are strongly hydrologically coupled in these peat systems. Saturation excess overland flow dominates hillslope runoff, particularly on more gentle slopes, and on footslopes where overland flow occurs most frequently. Overall, 81.5% of the total overland flow and matrix through flow collected by runoff troughs occurred at the peat surface, with 17.7% between the surface and 5 cm depth, 0.7% between 5 and 10 cm depth, and less than 0.1% from below 10 cm depth, despite the thickness of the peat deposit. Most storm flow is produced as saturation excess overland flow, whereas most low flow is produced by through flow from 1 to 5 cm depth. Topography and preferential flow paths are important controls on the spatial pattern of runoff even on low-gradient peat. On steeper midslope regions, more flow occurs within the upper 10 cm of peat rather than at the surface. Preferential flow paths are identified at both the hillslope and plot scale. Discharge deep within the peat is only produced from small macropore and pipe outlets that are well connected to the peat surface. Response to rainfall from these macropore networks is rapid, and they generate around 10% of streamflow.

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Hydrological studies on blanket peat: the significance of the acrotelm-catotelm model

1 Runoff production in blanket peat catchments of the northern Pennine hills, UK was measured through monitoring and experimentation at the plot, hillslope and catchment scale. Water flow from soil pipes was measured in one of the study catchments and overland flow, throughflow and water table were measured in runoff plots; rainfall simulation and tension-infiltrometry provided information on i...

متن کامل

Infiltration, runoff and sediment production in blanket peat catchments: implications of field rainfall simulation experiments

Blanket peat covers the headwaters of many major European rivers. Runoff production in upland blanket peat catchments is flashy with large flood peaks and short lag times; there is minimal baseflow. Little is known about the exact processes of infiltration and runoff generation within these upland headwaters. This paper presents results from a set of rainfall simulation experiments performed on...

متن کامل

Piping and pipeflow in a deep peat catchment

Natural pipes are common in many upland blanket peats, yet little is known about pipe network morphology or pipeflow processes. Most information on soil piping comes from the shallow peaty podzols of the Welsh uplands, where monitoring suggests that pipes may be important contributors to streamflow. This paper presents information on piping and pipeflow from a deep upland blanket peat catchment...

متن کامل

Controls of soil pipe frequency in upland blanket peat

[1] Soil pipes were surveyed in 160 British blanket peat catchments using consistent application of ground-penetrating radar. Soil pipes were found in all catchments. The mean frequency of piping was 69 per kilometer of surveyed transect. Land management (moorland gripping) appears to exert the most important control on hillslope pipe frequency in blanket peats. Management practice in peatlands...

متن کامل

Sediment and particulate carbon removal by pipe erosion increase over time in blanket peatlands as a consequence of land drainage

[1] Land drainage is common in peatlands. Artificially drained blanket peat catchments have been shown to have a significantly greater soil pipe density than intact catchments. This paper investigates the role of surface land drains in the enhancement of soil piping in blanket peats. The density of piping was found to significantly increase in a linear fashion with the age of the drainage. Thir...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

عنوان ژورنال:

دوره   شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2003